صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

claffes, numbers of the minifterial people agreed to diminish, by onethird, the ufe of wheaten bread in their families; a bill alfo was brought in, by fir John Sinclair, to encourage the cultivation of wafte lands, purfuant to the recommendation of the board of agriculture, eftablished for that purpose, and the more effectually to obviate the evil of fcarcity in future.

After these confultations, in what manner to provide for the immediate exigences of the country, the next object that occurred in parliament was the maintenance of the fleets and armies, requifite for the continuance of the war. To this end, Lord Arden moved, on the fourth of November, that one hundred and ten thousand feamen, including eighteen thousand marines, fhould be voted for the fea-fervice of the year 1796, and Mr. Wyndham moved alfe, that two hundred and feven thoufand men fhould be employed

for the fervice at land.

General Macleod took this oceafion to cenfure heavily the conduct of adminiftration, in paffing by officers of experience, and promoting to rank and command youths and others who were not properly qualified for military employments. General, Tarleton difapproved, at the fame time, the ftatement of expences laid before the houfe, as highly exhorbitant: from the year 1792 to the clofe of 1794, they had increafed, he faid, from one to eleven millions. Minifters were particularly reprehended, by the former, for their inadvertence in not furnishing the troops, fent to the Weft Indies, with a fufficient quantity of medical fores, and for maintaining at prefent, without neceffity, no lefs than a thoufand faff-officers. The numbers to which

8

the fencible cavalry amounted, he attributed to the minifterial plan of keeping the people in fubjection and dread; the regular cavalry, he faid, was equal to every just and proper purpofe, without loading the public with fo much additional expence.

In answer to thefe, and other
ftrictures, Mr. Wyndliam ftated, that
men of diftinction and oppulence
had been preferred to commands,
in their refpective counties, as more
able to procure levies than others.
The expences accompanying the
fencible cavalry were confiderably
lefs than thofe of the regulars, as
neither bounties nor half-pay were
allowed them. An ample supply of
medicines had been dispatched to
the Weft Indies, but had unhappily
fallen into the enemy's hands; an
accident which was remedied with
all poffible diligence.
The great
expences of the war had neceflarily
been augmented, proportionably to

the
greatnefs of the national exer-
tions; and the number of staff-officers
did not exceed that which was want-
ed for the duly conducting of the
bufinefs of army aud military affairs.
To an obfervation made by general
Smith, that the quantity of fubal-
terns had been out of all proportion
in fome regiments, Mr. Wyndham
replied, that the men being raised
in the heat of the campaign, it had
been found impracticable to pro
vide a timely fupply" in the place
of thofe that had been killed off."

This particular expreffion was taken up with violent acrimony both in and out of parliament: it was reprefented as denoting no fenfe of feeling, in the fpeaker, for the calamities of war, and the lofs of fo many individuals fallen in battle. This and fome other expreffions,

uttered

uttered in the warmth of debate, and produced probably by hurry and inadvertence, and not from a defect of humanity, however, drew upon this gentleman a heavy load of cenfure, and rendered him extremely unpopular.

His statements, on this occafion, were warmly controverted by thole in anfwer to whom he had made them. Members of parliament had, it was afferted, been placed at the head of the new raifed regiments: this was creating a patronage of the moft corrupt and unwarrantable kind, as many of the officers thus promoted were shamefully ignorant of their duty, and yet were allowed unconscionable profits. A variety of other objections was brought forward by the oppofition, and replied to by miniftry: after which, the refolutions relating to the fleet and army, moved by lord Arden and Mr. Wyndham, were put and carried.

Other ftrictures were then paffed upon the conduct of miniftry, in other particulars: that concerning the erection of barracks underwent the most remarkable cenfure. The expensive and unconstitutional nature of this measure was afferted by Mr. Fox, Mr. Sheridan, Mr. Whitbread, Mr. Courtney, and others; and its propriety no lefs vehemently supported by Mr. Pitt, Mr. Wyndham, and Mr. Dundas. In the courfe of this difcuffion, Mr. Whitbread moved to omit, in the estimate of neceffary expences, the fums appropriated to the conftruction of barracks: but the motion was negatived, by feventy-four to twenty-eight.

This bufinefs was not refumed till the eight of April following, when general Smith moved for a

committee to inquire into the expenditure arifing from the barracks, and upon what authority the erection was founded: he affirmed, that one million four hundred thousand pounds had been employed upon them. The patronage accruing from them to miniftry was the appointment of no lefs than fifty-fix officers for their management, with confiderable falaries. The number of barracks already conftructed were fufficient for the reception of thirtyfour thousand men, which were more than a peace-establishment by fourteen thousand. Did not fuch a meafure tend to imprefs the clearest and ftrongest conviction upon the public, that miniftry were determined, in the words of one of their principal members, to exert a vigour beyond the law?

Mr. Wyndham admitted the expences of the barracks to be great, but the importance of the object in view required them: their intent was to exonerate publicans, and people of that defcription, from the heavy charges to which they had fo long and fo unreasonably been liable, and of which they had so often and fo juftly complained. The neceffity of procuring public-houses for the reception of foldiers on their march occafioned fundry inconveniencies, which thefe barracks were calculated to remove: they would afford fhelter, and a temporary ftay, when neceffary, without producing trouble. and expence to innkeepers, and others, who kept places of accom modation on the roads. In the event of a peace, they need not contain any larger numbers than would be requifite for the ufual establishment; but while the war lafted, the indifpenbfile neceflity of holding men in readinefs, in fuch

[E 2]

critical

conftructed, as now, with the ma nifeft intention of fecluding the whole army from the nation, and cutting off, as much as in ministers lay, all intercourfe between foldiers and citizens. To diffolve a connection, fo indispensible in a land of liberty for its prefervation, was a deed.

critical times as the prefent, and the leffer expence at which they were kept together, with much more comfort and convenience to themselves, and utility to the public, than by the former method of quartering them, were, he prefumed, fufficient arguments in favour of barracks; 'nor would he omit the propriety of re-wholly unjuftifiable, and fhewed, moving foldiers from the danger of being contaminated by the feditious difpofition of the lower claffes.

It was obferved, in anfwer, by Mr. Taylor, that a total feparation of the foldiery from the commonalty, were it practicable, would obliterate that union of character which rendered military men citizens as well as foldiers, and endeared both classes to each other: when confcioufly united in one common intereft, their reciprocal attachment would produce the moft fignal advantages, through the fpirit and confidence they would act with, and the continual proofs of good will that would mutually arife between them.

Mr. Fox argued, with uncommon ftrength, against the fyftem of barracks, as tending directly to inculcate the blindest and most abject obedience in the foldiery. He explicitly afferted, that unconditional obedience was neither the duty of an English citizen, or an English foldier: the conftitution of England refted on the mixture of citizens and foldiers in all the habits and occurrences of life; to part them from each other, in the manner proposed, by lodging the troops in barracks, would be to divide them into diftinct people, who, from various caufes, would quickly become inimical to each other. True it was, that barracks had been erected in England before this time, but they were few and inconfiderable; not

3

without the neceffity of any farther argument, the real defigns in agitation.

Thefe affertions were, by Mr. Pitt, reprefented as totally unfounded. The fyftem of barracks was neither new nor unconftitutional; it was of long standing, and only of late enlarged, on the mere prin ciple of placing the troops upon a more convenient and useful footing. Parliament had given it a decided fanction; it had been carried on with all due diligence and economy, and could produce nothing that did not appear beneficial: foldiers would be better quartered, at a fmaller expence, and kept in more order without confining them from fociety in any cafes but thofe of confufion and tumult.

Mr. W. Smith, and Mr. Courtenay, fpoke in very adverfe terms of the cafe in queftion: the former reprobated the fyftem of barracks, as incompatible with the genius and conftitution of the people of this country, and fit only to prove that was defpotically governed. Thế latter in a ftrain of humour and pleafantry, expofed all thofe circumftances relating to the bufinefs, which could render it odious under the appearance of ridicule.

Mr. Grey cenfured the fyftem with great feverity. He demanded whether an addition of thirty-four thousand men was to be made to the peace establishment in future, as the old barracks would contain

twenty

twenty thousand, and the new ones the preceding number. If the barracks were not to be filled in this manner, why had fuch an expence been incurred to conftruct fo many?

He was answered by Mr. Steele, that, notwithstanding the exaggerations of thofe who affected fuch an apprehenfion of barracks, the whole of them, when completely finished, would not contain more than twenty-five thousand men; a number fo little above the ufual complement of the army, that no man could, with the least degree of ingenuoufnefs, infinuate that minifters harboured finifter defigns. The money, stated to have been laid out on the barracks, was alleged by the oppofition, to be unfairly accounted for: but Mr. Pitt replied, that no flaws would be found in the statement of the expence on due examination. The debate concluded with a divifion of ninety-eight for miniftry, and twenty-four against it.

On the feventh of December, Mr. Pitt laid before the house an eftimate of the expences of the approaching year. They amounted to twenty-feven millions five hundred thousand pounds, including a loan of eighteen millions. He gave a very favourable account of many branches of the revenue, particularly of the permanent taxes, which he ftated to be adequately productive to the extent of the fums expected from them. The intereft of the loan would amount to eleven hundred and twelve thousand pounds, for the payment of which, he would propofe the following taxes; two per cent on all legacies above a certain extent, to the first collaterals; three per cent. on firft coufins; four per cent. op fecond coufins; and fix

per cent. on the remoter relations, and ftrangers. Calculating the landed and perfonal property of the kingdom, as it ftood at the commencement of the prefent century, previously to its union with Scotland, its value amounted to thirteen hundred millions, of which fix hundred were in land, and feven hundred perfonal. From authentic documents it appeared, that about one-third of the latter was devised by will to collateral branches, and of the former about one-fifth. The probable estimate might be formed, by taking the fourth as a medium, which would give a tax of two hundred and ninety four thousand pounds. From this fum, by deducting the ftanding tax upon legacies; two hundred and fifty thousand pounds would remain. He next propofed ten per cent. on the already affeffed taxes, which would produce one hundred and forty thoufand pounds: one pound upon every horfe kept for pleasure, which would yield one hundred and fixteen thoufand pounds and two fhillings on every horfe kept for the purposes of labour, which he computed at one hundred thousand pounds: an additional tax on tobacco would produce one hundred and feventy thousand: and another on printed linens would bring one hundred and thirty-five thoufand: a duty upon falt thirty thoufand: and the reduction of the drawback on fugar, one hundred and eighty thoufand. The total of thefe various fums would amount to eleven hundred and twenty feven thousand pounds, which was more than fufficient for the propofed interest.

Mr. Pitt took particular notice, at the fame time, that in the fourth year of a most expensive war, such [E3]

was

was the profperity and opulence of. In the courfe of the fatiguing and

this country, that it was able to command the immenfe loan in queftion, at no more than four and a half per cent. He alfo afligned the reafon for his railing it without having recourfe to his ufual method of competition, which was, that the perfons concerned in procuring the laft loan, had not yet received the latter instalments due to them upon it. He had, however, fo far confulted the good of the public, that the interefts to them, would not prove more than four pounds five fhillings and three pence in the

hundred.

This affertion gave birth to a long and tedious difcuffion, uninterefting to those who were unconcerned in the bufinefs itself, or who did not think themselves authorifed to call him to a ftrict account for his proceedings in this matter.

In reply to the elaborate juftification of his conduct, made by Mr. Pitt on this critical occafion, the principal speakers in the oppofition exerted themfelves to refute his arguments and calculations, with uncommon acutenefs and fervour. They controverted his various pofitions and inferences, and laboured with the utmost industry to establish their own. The point, at which they chiefly aimed, was to prove that he had acted erroneously, and even difingenuously, in putting the bufinefs of the loan into the hands of Mr. Boyd, to whom it had been given the preceding year, and that no fubftantial and valid reason fubfifted for fuch a conduct, which they branded with many odious epithets, and represented in many of the circumftances attending it, as unwarrantable and corrupt.

acrimonious debates upon this fubject, fevere animadvertion was paffed by Mr. Fox upon the affair of the Hamburgh bills. They had, it feems, been drawn not really in London, but fictit oufly at the former place, by Mr. Boyd, to the amount of two millions five hundred thoufand pounds, on treafury-bills, for the fervice of government. Mr. Fox eftablished on this tranfaction, which he defcribed as highly uncreditable, the preference and partiali ty, which he reprefented as having manifefly been exercifed by the mi nifter in favour of that gentleman.

After altercations, marked with much bitternefs and animofity, the queftion was decided in favour of the minifter, by a majority that paffed a vote of entire approbation, relating to his conduct on the businefs of the loan; and, on the twenty-ninth of the enfuing February, the affair of the Hamburgh bills was alfo approved of, by putting a ne gative on the refolutions moved against them.

The motives alleged in his juftification, by his friends and adhe, rents, were, the very difficult circumftances that urged him to have recourse to the affiftance of thele bills, and the confequent propriety of acknowledging to important a fervice. The public in general was duly fenfible of the minifteria! embarallments refpecting both thefe cafes, and was willing to fufpend its feverity on the tranfactions themfelves, in confideration of the caufes that produced them, and that left the minifter a choice of difficulties, from which he found no readier a method to extricate himfelf.

« السابقةمتابعة »