What's Public About Charter Schools?: Lessons Learned About Choice and AccountabilityThis book contains evidence about charter schools that can provide important data on evaluating this new public-private hybrid and its success at serving the core purpose of public education. The book focuses on charter schools in Michigan, which is regarded as having one of the most permissive charter laws in the country. The first three chapters provide a theoretical framework for, and the descriptive context of, the charter-school reform in Michigan. Chapter 4 analyzes charter-school finance in Michigan. The remainder of the book seeks to evaluate the "public-ness" of Michigan charter schools according to the definitions introduced in the first chapter. The last chapter summarizes evidence and provides an answer to the question, "What's public about charter schools?" These schools appear to be doing a reasonably good job of creating communities of teachers with commonly held educational viewpoints, but may be doing so at the expense of equitable access to the schools and student-achievement gains. Three appendices contain key historical developments in Michigan that affected public and private schooling, background and documentation for analysis of student achievement, and a list of education-management organizations and schools they operated in 2000-01. (Contains 157 references.) (RT) |
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
Historical and Political Backdrop | 18 |
The Charter School Reform in Michigan | 28 |
Charter School Finance | 43 |
Choice and Access | 72 |
Teachers Characteristics and Working Conditions | 98 |
Innovation and Impact | 117 |
Student Achievement | 134 |
Customer Satisfaction | 148 |
The Effects of Education Management Organizations | 170 |
Lessons in Choice and Accountability | 194 |
Appendix A Key Historical Developments in Michigan That Have | 215 |
230 | |
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
Academies according accountability administration allow analysis areas assess authorizers average charter concept choice choose companies compared comparison group composite contracts costs curriculum differences discussed effective efficiency EMOs enrolled evidence examined expenditures facilities fact families Figure findings funding gains given goals Grade high school higher host districts impact important indicated innovation instruction involvement issues least less limited lower MEAP Michigan charter schools National Heritage Academies needs non-EMO noncharter noted operated outcomes parents percent performance practices proportion pupil question reasons receive reform relationship relative reported representatives require response satisfaction satisfied school districts school students scores serve significant similar special education spending staff student achievement studies suggest survey Table teachers traditional public schools types universities