Psychoanalytic Disagreements in Context

الغلاف الأمامي
Jason Aronson, 2008 - 229 من الصفحات
Contemporary psychoanalysts are eclectic and believe they use the best ideas from each of our numerous competing theoretic models. However, there is confusion and controversy about what constitutes "best." Critical differences between these theories are about inferences concerning the disguised meaning of what patients tell us There can be no meaning without context but we have never developed a consensus about how we establish context (contextualization). This book offers a number of detailed clinical examples to illustrate how confusion about contextualization serves as the source of some of our most important disagreements. Book jacket.

من داخل الكتاب

المحتوى

Introduction
1
CLINICAL EXAMPLES
21
Psychoanalytic Controversies Contextualized A Model of Clinical Disputes
23
Comparative Psychoanalysis What Should We Compare?
47
Memory Recovery as Viewed Through the OnePerson Versus the TwoPerson Theoretic Model
81
Free Associations Which Ones Count?
109
ASSOCIATIONS CONTEXTUALIZATION AND HERMENEUTICS
127
Another Kind of Incompleteness Associations and Interpretation
129
Contextualization
143
Contextualization and Hermeneutics
171
Glossary
213
Selected Readings Psychoanalysis Science and Epistemology
219
Index
223
About the Author
حقوق النشر

طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات

عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة

نبذة عن المؤلف (2008)

Dale Boesky is the past editor-in-chief of The Psychoanalytic Quarterly. He is a training and supervising analyst at the Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute.

معلومات المراجع