Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and ResponsibilityYale University Press, 01/01/1989 - 382 من الصفحات Sergeant William Calley's defense of his behavior in the My Lai massacre and the widespread public support for his argument that he was merely obeying orders from a superior and was not personally culpable led Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton to investigate the attitudes toward responsibility and authority that underlie "crimes of obedience"--not only in military circumstances like My Lai but as manifested in Watergate, the Iran-Contra scandal, and the Kurt Waldheim affair. Their book is an ardent plea for the right and obligation of citizens to resist illegal and immoral orders from above. |
المحتوى
Persistent Issues | 23 |
Reactions to the My Lai Massacre | 167 |
Responsibility in Authority Situations | 195 |
The Generality | 236 |
Individual Differences in Conceptions of Authority | 261 |
Three Orientations | 278 |
On Breaking the Habit of Unquestioning Obedience | 307 |
Appendix A Information about and Interest in the Calley | 341 |
References | 351 |
369 | |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accept actions active agent American analysis approved asked assign associated attitudes attribution authority situations become behavior Calley Calley's carried challenge chapter citizens claim command commitment concept concern consequences considered Consistent crimes of obedience definition demands discussion disobedience distinction duty effect example expected experiment factors follow forces higher identification important included independent individual influence interest internal involved issue judgments killing least legitimacy legitimate less means military moral motives norms obey obligation officers orders orientation participants pattern perceived percent person political position possible presented psychological question reactions reasons refer Refusers relationship relatively represented responsibility role rule sample scales sense shoot significant social society specific structure subordinates suggests superior survey tion trial turn types variables victims York