Andrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for AustraliaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this Ã¢â‚¬Å“a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State lawsÃ¢â‚¬Â (Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to Ã¢â‚¬Å“impotent debating societiesÃ¢â‚¬Â (Justice Callinan)?
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
Making Law Through Regulations
What It Means for Labour Relations
What It Means for Federation
Extracts from the Australian Constitution
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australia authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conciliation conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted established exclude existence expressed extending external fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations