Work ChoicesAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 100
الصفحة v
It was clear the decision was going to be important not only for the future of industrial relations , but for the balance of power in the Constitution between the Commonwealth and the States . The inspiration was an earlier book that ...
It was clear the decision was going to be important not only for the future of industrial relations , but for the balance of power in the Constitution between the Commonwealth and the States . The inspiration was an earlier book that ...
الصفحة ix
Australian Education Union Re Australian Education Union ; Ex parte Victoria ( 1995 ) 184 CLR 188 Bank of NSW v Commonwealth ( 1948 ) 76 CLR 1 Bayside City Council v Telstra Cor- poration Ltd ( 2004 ) 216 CLR 595 Bourke v State Bank of ...
Australian Education Union Re Australian Education Union ; Ex parte Victoria ( 1995 ) 184 CLR 188 Bank of NSW v Commonwealth ( 1948 ) 76 CLR 1 Bayside City Council v Telstra Cor- poration Ltd ( 2004 ) 216 CLR 595 Bourke v State Bank of ...
الصفحة x
Theophanous V. ( 2006 ) 80 ALJR 886 Uniform Tax cases - Commonwealth South Australia v Commonwealth ( 1942 ) 65 CLR 373 and Victoria v The Common- wealth ( 1957 ) 99 CLR 575 University of Wollongong - National Tertiary Education ...
Theophanous V. ( 2006 ) 80 ALJR 886 Uniform Tax cases - Commonwealth South Australia v Commonwealth ( 1942 ) 65 CLR 373 and Victoria v The Common- wealth ( 1957 ) 99 CLR 575 University of Wollongong - National Tertiary Education ...
الصفحة 2
All it had to decide was whether the Commonwealth had the constitutional power to pass that legis- lation . But given the depth of feeling over the new laws , some saw the High Court case as a chance to frustrate the federal govern- ...
All it had to decide was whether the Commonwealth had the constitutional power to pass that legis- lation . But given the depth of feeling over the new laws , some saw the High Court case as a chance to frustrate the federal govern- ...
الصفحة 3
The main power used by the Commonwealth as the basis for the Work Choices legislation was the corporations power in section 51 ( 20 ) of the Constitution . This power allows the Com- monwealth to make laws relating to " foreign ...
The main power used by the Commonwealth as the basis for the Work Choices legislation was the corporations power in section 51 ( 20 ) of the Constitution . This power allows the Com- monwealth to make laws relating to " foreign ...
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations