Work ChoicesFederation Press, 2007 - 190 من الصفحات Andrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 67
الصفحة 5
... Parliament of each State to " an impotent debating society " . It was time , he said , for the High Court to stop " strip - mining " the Constitution to discover new powers for the Commonwealth . Indeed by " reshaping the federation ...
... Parliament of each State to " an impotent debating society " . It was time , he said , for the High Court to stop " strip - mining " the Constitution to discover new powers for the Commonwealth . Indeed by " reshaping the federation ...
الصفحة 6
... Parliament . Many of the framers were also concerned to maintain the rights of the colonies when they became States in the new Australian nation . As politicians from the ... federal or State laws . Where there 6 Australia's Federal System.
... Parliament . Many of the framers were also concerned to maintain the rights of the colonies when they became States in the new Australian nation . As politicians from the ... federal or State laws . Where there 6 Australia's Federal System.
الصفحة 7
... Parliament . What was significant was that the States were left with everything else . It was thought that , by restric- ting the Commonwealth to specific ... Commonwealth powers and by the use of a doctrine of 7 Australia's Federal System.
... Parliament . What was significant was that the States were left with everything else . It was thought that , by restric- ting the Commonwealth to specific ... Commonwealth powers and by the use of a doctrine of 7 Australia's Federal System.
الصفحة 15
... federal workplace relations legislation . But rather than amend the Constitution , the government has called on ... Parliament of 26 May 2005 , outlining the thrust of his proposed reforms , the Prime Minister spoke of a national system ...
... federal workplace relations legislation . But rather than amend the Constitution , the government has called on ... Parliament of 26 May 2005 , outlining the thrust of his proposed reforms , the Prime Minister spoke of a national system ...
الصفحة 17
... Parliament with a single chamber - it has no " upper house " like the Senate . Its Parliament also has " plenary ... federal authority , or on which the Common- wealth has not chosen to make laws . In the case of industrial conflict ...
... Parliament with a single chamber - it has no " upper house " like the Senate . Its Parliament also has " plenary ... federal authority , or on which the Common- wealth has not chosen to make laws . In the case of industrial conflict ...
المحتوى
| 6 | |
| 26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations