Work ChoicesAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 28
الصفحة 2
ALP governments in every State and Territory , as well as several unions , were endeavouring in the Work Choices case to stop a conservative government that wanted to take over responsibility for regulating the employment of at least ...
ALP governments in every State and Territory , as well as several unions , were endeavouring in the Work Choices case to stop a conservative government that wanted to take over responsibility for regulating the employment of at least ...
الصفحة 5
We will also examine what the Howard Government was trying to achieve with its Work Choices reforms , and just why they prompted the States and Territories to take their concerns to the High Court . Chapter 2 Australia's Federal System ...
We will also examine what the Howard Government was trying to achieve with its Work Choices reforms , and just why they prompted the States and Territories to take their concerns to the High Court . Chapter 2 Australia's Federal System ...
الصفحة 24
On the basis of these powers , for instance , the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ( AIRC ) was permitted to make a " common rule " award that had effect throughout Victoria or the Territories . This would not have been ...
On the basis of these powers , for instance , the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ( AIRC ) was permitted to make a " common rule " award that had effect throughout Victoria or the Territories . This would not have been ...
الصفحة 36
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
الصفحة 37
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations