Work ChoicesAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 34
الصفحة 4
The majority judges accepted the Commonwealth's submissions that the corporations power should be given a broad interpretation . They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the ...
The majority judges accepted the Commonwealth's submissions that the corporations power should be given a broad interpretation . They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the ...
الصفحة 11
Since the Tasmanian Dam case ( 1983 ) the High Court has accepted that this power can be used to pass laws that implement obligations that have been assumed by the federal government under international instruments like treaties and ...
Since the Tasmanian Dam case ( 1983 ) the High Court has accepted that this power can be used to pass laws that implement obligations that have been assumed by the federal government under international instruments like treaties and ...
الصفحة 12
legislate in areas formerly under State control is , according to the long accepted approach of the High Court , irrelevant . Since 1920 then , the steady trend of High Court decisions has favoured a broad reading of federal power at ...
legislate in areas formerly under State control is , according to the long accepted approach of the High Court , irrelevant . Since 1920 then , the steady trend of High Court decisions has favoured a broad reading of federal power at ...
الصفحة 40
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
الصفحة 41
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
لقد وصلت إلى حد العرض المسموح لهذا الكتاب.
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations