Work ChoicesFederation Press, 2007 - 190 من الصفحات Andrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 42
الصفحة iv
... Amendment ( Work Choices ) Act 2005. 2 . Australia . Workplace Relations Amendment Regulations 2006 ( No 2 ) . 3 . Australia . High Court . 4. Judicial opinions Australia . 5. Labor laws and legislation - Australia Cases . 6 ...
... Amendment ( Work Choices ) Act 2005. 2 . Australia . Workplace Relations Amendment Regulations 2006 ( No 2 ) . 3 . Australia . High Court . 4. Judicial opinions Australia . 5. Labor laws and legislation - Australia Cases . 6 ...
الصفحة 1
... amendments sought to marginalise - though by no means eliminate the role played by trade unions and industrial tribunals . - The Howard Government believed that by increasing flexi- bility for employers the entire economy would benefit ...
... amendments sought to marginalise - though by no means eliminate the role played by trade unions and industrial tribunals . - The Howard Government believed that by increasing flexi- bility for employers the entire economy would benefit ...
الصفحة 14
... amendment can be made with- out the support of a majority of voters in a majority of States . On seven different occasions , in 1911 , 1913 , 1919 , 1926 , 1944 , 1946 and 1973 , these proposals failed at referenda to achieve the ...
... amendment can be made with- out the support of a majority of voters in a majority of States . On seven different occasions , in 1911 , 1913 , 1919 , 1926 , 1944 , 1946 and 1973 , these proposals failed at referenda to achieve the ...
الصفحة 16
... amendment to the draft Constitution were delivered , ironically enough , by a Western Australian delegation who at that stage had real doubts about their own colony joining the federation . The provision that was inserted into the ...
... amendment to the draft Constitution were delivered , ironically enough , by a Western Australian delegation who at that stage had real doubts about their own colony joining the federation . The provision that was inserted into the ...
الصفحة 18
... amendment to the Constitution in 1946 - one of the few times the Constitution has been successfully changed . As we will see , the Commonwealth Parliament does in fact have a range of other legislative powers on which it can call if it ...
... amendment to the Constitution in 1946 - one of the few times the Constitution has been successfully changed . As we will see , the Commonwealth Parliament does in fact have a range of other legislative powers on which it can call if it ...
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations