Work ChoicesAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 33
الصفحة v
It was clear the decision was going to be important not only for the future of industrial relations , but for the balance of power in the Constitution between the Commonwealth and the States . The inspiration was an earlier book that ...
It was clear the decision was going to be important not only for the future of industrial relations , but for the balance of power in the Constitution between the Commonwealth and the States . The inspiration was an earlier book that ...
الصفحة 1
In a nutshell , the Work Choices reforms shifted the balance in favour of employers , giving them greater freedom in the terms on which they can hire and ( if necessary ) ...
In a nutshell , the Work Choices reforms shifted the balance in favour of employers , giving them greater freedom in the terms on which they can hire and ( if necessary ) ...
الصفحة 3
Although this was not always explicit in their submissions , they were in effect asking the Court to recognise that the " federal balance " would be disturbed if the Commonwealth could use its corporations power as broadly as the ...
Although this was not always explicit in their submissions , they were in effect asking the Court to recognise that the " federal balance " would be disturbed if the Commonwealth could use its corporations power as broadly as the ...
الصفحة 4
They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the Constitution . Two judges gave separate dissenting judgments . Justices Michael Kirby and Ian Callinan would each have found the ...
They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the Constitution . Two judges gave separate dissenting judgments . Justices Michael Kirby and Ian Callinan would each have found the ...
الصفحة 8
In formulating these doctrines they saw themselves as developing a model of balanced federalism . However , from 1906 onwards , when Justices Isaac ... In 1920 the Court discarded any idea of a balance between federal and State power .
In formulating these doctrines they saw themselves as developing a model of balanced federalism . However , from 1906 onwards , when Justices Isaac ... In 1920 the Court discarded any idea of a balance between federal and State power .
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
| 6 | |
| 26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations
معلومات المراجع
| العنوان | Work Choices |
| المؤلفون | Andrew Stewart, George Williams |
| الناشر | Federation Press, 2007 |
| رقم ISBN (الرقم الدولي المعياري للكتاب) | 1862876428, 9781862876422 |
| عدد الصفحات | 190 من الصفحات |
| تصدير الاقتباس | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |