Work ChoicesAndrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 21
الصفحة 17
... federal authority , or on which the Common- wealth has not chosen to make laws . In the case of industrial conflict , the framers of the Constitu- tion had quite carefully limited the Commonwealth to dealing with interstate disputes ...
... federal authority , or on which the Common- wealth has not chosen to make laws . In the case of industrial conflict , the framers of the Constitu- tion had quite carefully limited the Commonwealth to dealing with interstate disputes ...
الصفحة 18
This body had powers to prevent and settle interstate industrial disputes , either by making awards or by registering agreements between employers and trade unions . In its early years the Court had little work to do .
This body had powers to prevent and settle interstate industrial disputes , either by making awards or by registering agreements between employers and trade unions . In its early years the Court had little work to do .
الصفحة 19
The dispute that resulted from the rejection of these claims would then be notified to the Court of Conciliation and Arbitration as an interstate dispute . From 1913 onwards , the High Court was prepared to treat these " paper disputes ...
The dispute that resulted from the rejection of these claims would then be notified to the Court of Conciliation and Arbitration as an interstate dispute . From 1913 onwards , the High Court was prepared to treat these " paper disputes ...
الصفحة 23
This was found to be valid by the High Court in Pidoto ( 1943 ) , notwithstanding that the wartime laws were not confined to resolving interstate disputes . The Court has also upheld provisions authorising the federal arbitration ...
This was found to be valid by the High Court in Pidoto ( 1943 ) , notwithstanding that the wartime laws were not confined to resolving interstate disputes . The Court has also upheld provisions authorising the federal arbitration ...
الصفحة 24
The main powers used in this regard had been those over interstate or international trade and commerce ( section 51 ( 1 ) ) , trading , finan- cial or foreign corporations ( section 51 ( 20 ) ) , the public service ( section 52 ( 2 ) ...
The main powers used in this regard had been those over interstate or international trade and commerce ( section 51 ( 1 ) ) , trading , finan- cial or foreign corporations ( section 51 ( 20 ) ) , the public service ( section 52 ( 2 ) ...
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations