Work ChoicesFederation Press, 2007 - 190 من الصفحات Andrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 30
الصفحة v
... judges had to say . The extracts are arranged over a series of chapters that deal with separate aspects of the case . To make the judgments more readable we have omitted all the footnotes and references , though a separate table has the ...
... judges had to say . The extracts are arranged over a series of chapters that deal with separate aspects of the case . To make the judgments more readable we have omitted all the footnotes and references , though a separate table has the ...
الصفحة 3
... judges over the years expressing a range of opinions on the matter . Some judges had taken a narrow view of the power . For them , the clue was in the categories of corporations specified as being within power : " foreign corporations ...
... judges over the years expressing a range of opinions on the matter . Some judges had taken a narrow view of the power . For them , the clue was in the categories of corporations specified as being within power : " foreign corporations ...
الصفحة 4
... judges accepted the Commonwealth's submissions that the corporations power should be given a broad interpretation . They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the Constitution ...
... judges accepted the Commonwealth's submissions that the corporations power should be given a broad interpretation . They rejected any sugges- tion that they should have regard to some kind of federal balance implicit in the Constitution ...
الصفحة 8
... judges , Chief Justice Samuel Griffith and Justices Edmund Barton and Richard O'Connor . In formulating these doctrines they saw themselves as developing a model of balanced federalism . However , from 1906 onwards , when Justices Isaac ...
... judges , Chief Justice Samuel Griffith and Justices Edmund Barton and Richard O'Connor . In formulating these doctrines they saw themselves as developing a model of balanced federalism . However , from 1906 onwards , when Justices Isaac ...
الصفحة 9
... judges or senior public servants , and nor could it tell a State how many people , or who , to employ . But the Court saw no problem with a federal award prescribing wage rates or other employment conditions for teachers in State ...
... judges or senior public servants , and nor could it tell a State how many people , or who , to employ . But the Court saw no problem with a federal award prescribing wage rates or other employment conditions for teachers in State ...
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations