| David Hume - 2003 - عدد الصفحات: 484
...into our passions and emotions; none of which can possibly represent a substance. We have therefore no idea of substance, distinct from that of a collection...we any other meaning when we either talk or reason conceming it. The idea of a substance as well as that of a mode, is nothing but a collection of simple... | |
| James R. Mensch - 2003 - عدد الصفحات: 240
...underlying experience. We are limited to the immediate givens of experience. This means, according to Hume, that "we have ... no idea of substance distinct from that of a collection of particular qualities [given as contents of our perceptions]" (16; bk. I, pt. I, sec. 6). When, for example, the self trains... | |
| Georges Dicker - 2004 - عدد الصفحات: 280
...Introduction (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 15-17, 21-31. 51. Hartnack, Kant's Theory of Knowledge, p. 41. 52. "We have ... no idea of substance, distinct from that...other meaning when we either talk or reason concerning it." David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed., ed. LA Selby-Bigge and PH Nidditch (Oxford: Oxford... | |
| Kathy McReynolds - 2004 - عدد الصفحات: 106
...of Human Nature. philosopher David Hume rejects Aristotle's idea of substance: We have, therefore, no idea of substance, distinct from that of a collection of particular qualities, not have we any other meaning when we either talk or reason concerning it. The idea of substance as... | |
| Bernard Mabille - 2004 - عدد الصفحات: 406
...c'est-à-dire suivant le soi en tant qu'il est le sien, et qu'elle contemple ce mouvement2 ». Le sujet parlant have we any other meaning when we either talk or reason concerning it » (A Treatise cf Un ma n Nature, I, VI, Of modes and substances). 1 . « Das Denken verliert daher... | |
| Victor Lowe - 19?? - عدد الصفحات: 1056
...into our passions and emotions; none of which can possibly represent a substance. We have, therefore, no idea of substance, distinct from that of a collection...other meaning when we either talk or reason concerning it.' This passage is concerned with a notion of 'substance,' which I do not entertain. Thus it only... | |
| |